What constitutes the basis for a warrantless arrest in the context of assault or battery on an intellectually disabled person?

In the context of warrantless arrests for assault or battery on an intellectually disabled person, criteria related to felony charge requirements are essential. Generally, warrantless arrests are permissible when a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed. This standard holds particularly true in cases involving serious offenses such as assault or battery, which may result in significant harm or injury.

In many jurisdictions, the assault or battery of an intellectually disabled person is treated with heightened scrutiny due to the vulnerability of the victim. If law enforcement officers witness or have credible evidence suggesting a felony has occurred—such as visible injuries or clearly articulated victim statements—they can perform a warrantless arrest based on their assessment of the severity and circumstances surrounding the alleged crime.

The other options, while potentially relevant to the situation, do not meet the legal standards necessary for a warrantless arrest on their own. Witness statements can provide context but must lead to probable cause regarding a felony. Victim testimony, while important, may not always be sufficient by itself if not corroborated by other evidence. Consent of the family is generally not a factor that justifies or negates the need for a warrant, especially in cases of serious crimes where the state has an obligation to protect vulnerable individuals. Thus,